cheeaun thinks
17 years ago
that plurk should use jquery/mootools/any more compact framework. :-P
latest #18
ryanlim says
17 years ago
i'm pretty sure it is already pretty compact :-)
cheeaun says
17 years ago
a lot of http requests...
ryanlim
17 years ago
says thats what you get for being plurk - constant refreshes and updates to your page.
立即下載
cheeaun says
17 years ago
i mean one of those yahoo advices on speeding up web apps?
cheeaun says
17 years ago
and uh comet? :-P
ryanlim says
17 years ago
the http requests made to plurk are pretty light weight. if you inspect what gets sent and received, they are only what is necessary.
ryanlim says
17 years ago
the js code is then used to parse the response and put it on the timeline
cheeaun says
17 years ago
ic...
alvin
17 years ago
ryan, i think he's talking about the JS script link, instead of the ajax polling.
ryanlim says
17 years ago
yep. i've "analyzed" it already hahaha
ryanlim says
17 years ago
ohhh ok
alvin
17 years ago
anyway, we've looked at those JS libs out there before we started coding. for the combination of various reasons,
alvin
17 years ago
we choose to use our own libs.
alvin
17 years ago
footprint is one thing. mootools and jquery started off with 20kb before you even start coding.
cheeaun says
17 years ago
but it's great for web app with mutliple features.
alvin
17 years ago
i'm sure. but it really depends on what you mean by feature.
alvin
17 years ago
it all comes down to using the best tool for the project. :-)
cheeaun says
17 years ago
i see...
back to top