ChRiSTiNe is
16 years ago
reading Justice Artemio Panganiban's column - How the Supreme Court decides cases.
latest #22
ChRiSTiNe says
16 years ago
`Normally, to show its disdain for utterly unmeritorious and “cerebrally deficient” petitions, it simply dismisses them via one-sentence...`
ChRiSTiNe says
16 years ago
`resolutions.`
ChRiSTiNe says
16 years ago
(LOL)
立即下載
JorgeJee
16 years ago
(thinking)
JorgeJee says
16 years ago
Pretty much the same way I dismiss application letters. I can tell by just the 1st paragraph... :-D
JorgeJee says
16 years ago
Well put! `cerebrally deficient` (applause)
ChRiSTiNe says
16 years ago
JorgeJee: that's why we ought to have a Chief Justice for President. How I wish Justice Puno would reconsider. (goodluck)
JorgeJee says
16 years ago
I have got to share this to lawyer friends... :-D
ChRiSTiNe says
16 years ago
(dance)
JorgeJee says
16 years ago
Posted link on my facebook where most of them hang out... (evil_grin)
ChRiSTiNe says
16 years ago
ChRiSTiNe says
16 years ago
`By showing off a full-length ponencia that is normally issued only after the “three rounds” described above are undertaken, the Court...`
ChRiSTiNe says
16 years ago
`...accorded what it said “cerebral deficits” did not deserve: its valuable time and attention.`
ChRiSTiNe says
16 years ago
`In damning the petitions garrulously, the Court relished the gallery more than its own time-tested profundity.`
JorgeJee
16 years ago
(applause)
travel6ug says
16 years ago
enitsirhc: (LOL) love it!!!
travel6ug says
16 years ago
enitsirhc: btw, i was at the makansutra event with dementia, food was great and lot of prizes for everyone :-)
travel6ug says
16 years ago
lots of*
ChRiSTiNe says
16 years ago
travel6ug: (tears) *inggit*
travel6ug says
16 years ago
JorgeJee says
16 years ago
We should join and get into those plurk fiestas one of these days... (thinking)
back to top