bloggersblog says
17 years ago
i'm not buying this graph about Plurk's traffic (g_not_talking)
latest #17
Konstantino says
17 years ago
it seems way too low right now, though I do agree that it definitely dropped. Many people tried Plurk when they were fed up with Twitter,
KDFrawg 🐸 says
17 years ago
Me either.
Konstantino says
17 years ago
...but most hated it and left.
立即下載
KDFrawg 🐸 says
17 years ago
Looks like a graph of Plurk traffic by the A-Listers.
NetHead says
17 years ago
monthly visits/weekly visits shows when Leo sent out the word about Plurk and then others learned
bloggeries says
17 years ago
I don't buy any of those kind of graphs
🇺🇦HighDef🇺🇦 says
17 years ago
the other tabs there reveal that the data is made-up. There's no way they have stats on plurker ethnicity, education, kids, and income!
bloggeries says
17 years ago
highdef lol that is something I thought a well.
bloggersblog
17 years ago
interesting myriam - compete's graph is pretty similar
bloggersblog
17 years ago
although the overall user number is hugher at about 40,000
PlurkingPoppa
17 years ago
wonders what happened in March that caused the spike?
mitchkeeler says
17 years ago
might be more interesting in a few months to see how it all averages out.
dcousineau says
17 years ago
loadtesting?
dangrsmind says
17 years ago
quantimetrics uses a panel to get those results I believe, so the estimates are only as good as the panel....
dangrsmind says
17 years ago
FWIW I looked at another site for which I am familiar with the approximate visitor numbers ant the estimate was pretty good.
back to top