Login
Sign Up For Free
English
中文 (繁體)
中文 (香港)
中文 (简体)
日本語
Filipino
Bahasa Indonesia
Bahasa Melayu
Pусский
Português (Brasil)
Magyar
Français
Español
Deutsch
Čeština
العربية
Català
Dansk
Ελληνικά
فارسی
Suomi
Gaeilge
Hindi
עברית
Hrvatski
Italiano
Norsk bokmål
Nederlands
한국어
Polski
Română
Slovenský
Svenska
Türkçe
українська
беларуская
ไทย
Standard view
Kafka
says
17 years ago
Wow... I can't even begin to know what to say about this. Wow.
tinyurl.com/5vvqyk
latest #15
TheBadMonkey
says
17 years ago
it's so tasteles. Is that supposed to be a joke or commentary? I don't get it.
A Bunnyfear
says
17 years ago
I agree with the quote that it will upset and delight all the wrong people. Ugh at the New Yorker's sad attempt to stay relevant.
A Bunnyfear
17 years ago
agrees with
myfrienddanielle
立即下載
kafkaz
says
17 years ago
yikes.
Kafka
17 years ago
I understand the point of the illustration but to put it on the cover with no context?
Kafka
17 years ago
I agree. Difficult top put in context.. which is why it should have been included with the article and NOT on the cover.
kafkaz
thinks
17 years ago
satire can be a tricky business, indeed.
Cynthia
says
17 years ago
I think it's a fine cover. Those who don't get the joke and commentary weren't going to support him anyway. Stop pussyfooting around them.
pharmgirl
says
17 years ago
oh boy...
back to top
delete
reply
edit
cancel
cancel