Where is the integrity if its not fully discussed?

I know of food bloggers that avoids negative posts and criticize the place

is that even right?

den it boils down to my 2nd thread... when you say its negative... did the review offer constructive criticism?

Its really abt style lah. Each reviewer has a right to his opinion. Multiplicity of reviews helps a serious foodie make his decision.

To rely on a single source as authoritative to all food types can be a little myopic.

Altho if a reviewer has been spot on for a certain kind of food "genre"... Then hey... More power to him.

... or her...

Some readers just prefer to hear facts, others prefer opinions... Being balanced is a little overrated, but still appreciated.