emrose9 thinks
16 years ago
it is odd that Du Bois calls the caste distinction emasculating--why not dehumanizing or something less gender specific?
latest #10
EmilyP1 says
16 years ago
The whole thing is very gender specific- voting rights for all men etc etc. I think this might be the influence of the time period.
noars was
16 years ago
thinking about the gender issue within washington/du bois a little too. hahah at the end du bois says something about voting and achieving
noars says
16 years ago
manhood. ..i think it's funny that they at the time never conceived gender problems. priorities i spose. haha
立即下載
noars says
16 years ago
definitely not complaining though, just think it's funny.
jgr3g0ry
16 years ago
Gender was a big issue at the time but it wasn't as successful as race. African American men were franchised with the 15th amendment in 1870
jgr3g0ry
16 years ago
but it took women another 50 years before they got the vote with the 17th amendment in 1920.
jgr3g0ry
16 years ago
The funny thing is that we often see equal rights more universally now - equal between races and sexes - but historically the camps weren't
jgr3g0ry
16 years ago
always so close. African Americans sometimes felt women were trying to ride in on the coattails of their social battle; women sometimes
jgr3g0ry
16 years ago
didn't want to be associated with African Americans. Other times the groups worked together more successfully. The ones that had it the
jgr3g0ry
16 years ago
worst were the African American women. They were treated as the lowest group in this particular hiearchy of race and sex.
back to top