might not be hard to do if they have watched & learned about architecture
maybe if they had servers that didn't suck like twiFAIl
until u gain more followers...
they made some infrastructure changes pretty promptly on the weekend so if that response is any indication it bodes well?
shocked that it's holding up as well as it has. I've only noticed very minor semi-downtimes so far, but OTOH, Twitter has *way* more users
plurk to be reliable and believes it will turn out to be so. or at least i hope so. so, yeah!
I actually give it 1 chance in 3.
Or more to the point how is plurk going to scale ? I'm very interested as to why they use python. Let me think Googleapp uses python too ?!
it's all to do with how many users, twitter is getting hit because it's getting popular. I'd like to see how Plurk scales when it gets hit
anyone know what platform they're using here? please tell me it's not ruby.
oh wait n/m. i see the python thing. python = encouraging.
we'll see how it scales now scoble has his name back
Come on look up twitter's architecture on high
scalability.com. It's a kiddies system. Plurk is threading tweets here which is more load
I recogn plurk is handing us real well at the moment but will have problems
hehe. all the images on the
scalability.com home page are broken. guess it didn't scale.
haha funny stuff
the question actually is, is plurk actually more useful than twitter...
well now that plurk is taking some of the traffic from twitter, it should be interesting to see what happens with both services.
if not, now that you're here, they can blame you for outages
if you can't, I recommend hari-kari.
that it will be more stable
plurk to be more stable, they seem to be coping with the sudden influx at the moment
plurk would perform better than twitter
I put my money on Python over Ruby anyday performance- and scale-wise.
we will find out if there is some big news event that everyone starts talking about
WWDC?
IM is not working, it worked for while but now it is offline
wondering what will happen if plurk follows twitter's history. hope the guys knows the load
w2k7beta not only that for the same amount of users as twitter, plurk will have to work 2-3s as harder due to greater functionality offered
I sure hope so
shaf A lot depends on how it's engineered. Twitter would be very scalable if they'd designed it as a messaging system, not a CMS.
ianbetteridge. You took the words right out of my mouth. Message queues, message queues, message queues
plus, of course, fitter hamsters to run in the wheels that power their servers!
so far so good but the load is nowhere near twitters yet
that it is so too early to tell. They haven't released their API yet. When they do, we will see.
mahadewa plurk is already budging at the seams. A good indicator to check is to see if their IM bot is up. If it is... the load can cope
doesn't hold out much hope as the userbase gets bigger
he has faith in this platform. It's doing a lot more work than you realise.
at this pt, I think yes. but I cannot say for sure if scob manages to pull in >20K followers and having >20k+ plurking at any one time.
scob if he know the hardware used for plurk
I fink so. Hey
scobleizer why won't you approve mah friend request, man?
so far so good. i think since they do not have all the developer API hits it just might survive and scale.
can't get Twitter right now.
yes because they don't have SMS and IM. i think plurk has a smaller update foot print vs twitter.