brain injury:
the Ogre/GEV Combat Results Table:
i've long held that 2 x 1:1 attacks are more effective than 1 x 2:1 attack.
the probability of any outcome - no effect, disabled, destroyed - is not simple to calculate because 1/3 of the time the first 1:1 attack succeeds
the Ogre/GEV Combat Results Table:
i've long held that 2 x 1:1 attacks are more effective than 1 x 2:1 attack.
the probability of any outcome - no effect, disabled, destroyed - is not simple to calculate because 1/3 of the time the first 1:1 attack succeeds
i'm working on python code to do empirical testing to come up with a definitive answer.
Problem: what is the question?
how should the question be posed to end up with meaningful data that can decide with method is more effective?
Problem: what is the question?
how should the question be posed to end up with meaningful data that can decide with method is more effective?
Lemongrass
says
ooh, that game looks fun!
Lemongrass
says
it doesn’t seem to be available in the UK 
what?!
not available on steam uk?
not available on steam uk?
Lemongrass
says
I was looking at the board game.
ah.
that’s weird.
figured it would be world wide
that’s weird.
figured it would be world wide
wow!
was I wrong
was I wrong
n: 1000 sides: 6
crt 2:1
1 ne
2 d
3 d
4 x
5 x
6 x
attacks: 1686
results:
ne: 285 d: 560 x: 841
crt 2:1
1 ne
2 d
3 d
4 x
5 x
6 x
attacks: 1686
results:
ne: 285 d: 560 x: 841
n: 1000
sides: 6
crt 1:1
1 ne
2 ne
3 d
4 d
5 x
6 x
attacks: 2266
results: ne: 746 d: 795 x: 725
sides: 6
crt 1:1
1 ne
2 ne
3 d
4 d
5 x
6 x
attacks: 2266
results: ne: 746 d: 795 x: 725