bloggersblog thinks
17 years ago
he would lose some tweepii if he tweeted like he plurks.
latest #18
Mokona feels
17 years ago
the same way. I love chatty plurkers, but not so much on Twitter.
DaisyOlsen
17 years ago
I believe that you are absolutely right. The nested replies does encourage banter LOL
bloggersblog says
17 years ago
the tweepii would think we are crazy. :-P
立即下載
BigO says
17 years ago
twitter is more adult than something? Who would have thought.
Mokona
17 years ago
not to mention we have to conserve space on twitter... can't read through old tweets (past the first page) lately.
ismail thinks
17 years ago
so too, we would need to take a tweet break and silence you
dangrsmind says
17 years ago
plurk's visual architecture not only provides more real-estate, its framed around conversations. A big jump forward from Twitter IMO.
DaisyOlsen
17 years ago
all depends on what you want to use it for IMO
dangrsmind says
17 years ago
how about,umm, conversing? Ok, enough snark I agree with DaisyOlsen. Now try to have this coversation on Twitter.
DaisyOlsen
17 years ago
you would get blocked a million times over
Morton Fox thinks
17 years ago
Plurk is for plurking, while Twitter is for tweeting.
ismail says
17 years ago
mortonfox great insight!
gm5000 says
17 years ago
technically, twitter is for "updating"
tmatzner says
17 years ago
At least, Twitter is more comfortable, but less reliable in these days.
fdossantos says
17 years ago
daisyOlsen nested does keep the banter going and makes it feel more like a conversation. Twitter doesn't keep a thread going easily
back to top