Login
Sign Up For Free
English
中文 (繁體)
中文 (香港)
中文 (简体)
日本語
Filipino
Bahasa Indonesia
Bahasa Melayu
Pусский
Português (Brasil)
Magyar
Français
Español
Deutsch
Čeština
العربية
Català
Dansk
Ελληνικά
فارسی
Suomi
Gaeilge
Hindi
עברית
Hrvatski
Italiano
Norsk bokmål
Nederlands
한국어
Polski
Română
Slovenský
Svenska
Türkçe
українська
беларуская
ไทย
Standard view
bloggersblog
thinks
17 years ago
he would lose some tweepii if he tweeted like he plurks.
latest #18
Mokona
feels
17 years ago
the same way. I love chatty plurkers, but not so much on Twitter.
DaisyOlsen
17 years ago
I believe that you are absolutely right. The nested replies does encourage banter LOL
bloggersblog
says
17 years ago
the tweepii would think we are crazy.
立即下載
BigO
says
17 years ago
twitter is more adult than something? Who would have thought.
Mokona
17 years ago
not to mention we have to conserve space on twitter... can't read through old tweets (past the first page) lately.
ismail
thinks
17 years ago
so too, we would need to take a tweet break and silence you
dangrsmind
says
17 years ago
plurk's visual architecture not only provides more real-estate, its framed around conversations. A big jump forward from Twitter IMO.
DaisyOlsen
17 years ago
all depends on what you want to use it for IMO
dangrsmind
says
17 years ago
how about,umm, conversing? Ok, enough snark I agree with
DaisyOlsen
. Now try to have this coversation on Twitter.
DaisyOlsen
17 years ago
you would get blocked a million times over
Morton Fox
thinks
17 years ago
Plurk is for plurking, while Twitter is for tweeting.
ismail
says
17 years ago
mortonfox great insight!
gm5000
says
17 years ago
technically, twitter is for "updating"
tmatzner
says
17 years ago
At least, Twitter is more comfortable, but less reliable in these days.
fdossantos
says
17 years ago
daisyOlsen
nested does keep the banter going and makes it feel more like a conversation. Twitter doesn't keep a thread going easily
back to top
delete
reply
edit
cancel
cancel