You know? This really upsets me about LL. This article is so contrived. You can tell plainly that Scoble was paid or corced here.

He makes no mention of who Mark Kingdon is at all yet he uses this paragraph..

On Friday I sat down with Mark to find out why.

It is just BAD writing or writing that was rushed onto the blog for a few bucks.

This is a really big deal. A lot of people have worked really hard at this. Why make it look cheap?

Just because the guy has a lot of followers shouldn't mean that he gets to push off such piss poor (paid) commentary.

agree its a poor post, in the comments I read something about it being late/going to bed, does seem rushed/last minute plug for tomorrow

I have just zero faith in these social network marketing buffoons.. To me the whole biz reeks of "Tulip Mania".