Login
Sign Up For Free
English
中文 (繁體)
中文 (香港)
中文 (简体)
日本語
Filipino
Bahasa Indonesia
Bahasa Melayu
Pусский
Português (Brasil)
Magyar
Français
Español
Deutsch
Čeština
العربية
Català
Dansk
Ελληνικά
فارسی
Suomi
Gaeilge
Hindi
עברית
Hrvatski
Italiano
Norsk bokmål
Nederlands
한국어
Polski
Română
Slovenský
Svenska
Türkçe
українська
беларуская
ไทย
Standard view
ThoughtWrong
asks
17 years ago
A 64-bit Operating System is required to take advantage of 4GB memory. A 32-bit Operating System only recognizes up to 3GB memory ? Really?
latest #17
lizard.beer
17 years ago
really.
phoenixbird
says
17 years ago
Yes, and more... our hardware will need to handle more, and a lot of old 32 bit software is no longer going to work because of how much is
phoenixbird
says
17 years ago
changed when we go to 64bit architecture.
立即下載
ThoughtWrong
thinks
17 years ago
he wil be sticking with 32 bit for now then, as much of his software will not function via 64bit OS.
🇺🇦HighDef🇺🇦
17 years ago
I'll stick with my Mac Classic.
🇺🇦HighDef🇺🇦
17 years ago
...it's got a
*grayscale*
monitor!
lizard.beer
17 years ago
grayscale! wow. so you have ... all the colors of grey? that must be soothing on the eyes.
Griffy.Lapin
has
17 years ago
no clue but thinks it is all good...
AZJazzyJ
says
17 years ago
technically that's not true, a 32-bit OS can support greater than 3 GB but not contiguously meaning that it could page it.
AZJazzyJ
says
17 years ago
Win XP and Vista will show only 3 GB usable memory but the OS itself will use the excess for internal calculations and paging.
amix
17 years ago
AZJazzyJ
: that's correct for linux at least, i am unsure if it holds for windows thought
AZJazzyJ
says
17 years ago
I know it's true for Vista based on testing I've done although it is not well documented.
phoenixbird
17 years ago
learns something new every day (or night) here at Plurk... I'll have to keep that in mind
AZJazzyJ
. Is that only true in Vista 32bit then?
AZJazzyJ
says
17 years ago
I've verified this is true in Vista, I haven't tested it under XP (yet). You are still better off with a 64-bit OS for apps to use memory.
SteveBob
says
17 years ago
technically 32 bits could address 4.29 x 10^9 (4.29 Gig) of address space. 64 bits could addr 1.84 x 10^19.
AZJazzyJ
thinks
17 years ago
the device drivers for a 64-bit Microsoft OS are now to a point where the stability is on par with the 32-bit drivers.
back to top
delete
reply
edit
cancel
cancel