Login
Sign Up For Free
English
中文 (繁體)
中文 (香港)
中文 (简体)
日本語
Filipino
Bahasa Indonesia
Bahasa Melayu
Pусский
Português (Brasil)
Magyar
Français
Español
Deutsch
Čeština
العربية
Català
Dansk
Ελληνικά
فارسی
Suomi
Gaeilge
Hindi
עברית
Hrvatski
Italiano
Norsk bokmål
Nederlands
한국어
Polski
Română
Slovenský
Svenska
Türkçe
українська
беларуская
ไทย
Standard view
JenLarkin
wants
16 years ago
to go to India and smack someone in the head
latest #13
JenLarkin
says
16 years ago
for one thing, I am not accepting as bugs, feature requests to handle "bad UI"
JenLarkin
says
16 years ago
for another thing, I am not accepting any claims of bad UI based on business rules that you have been told repeatedly are not in this phase
JenLarkin
says
16 years ago
and for yet another thing, if you had bothered to test every step that you listed that was the "bad UI" you would have proved yourself wrong
立即下載
JenLarkin
says
16 years ago
sociallydistressed
16 years ago
Kavka
thinks
16 years ago
this is understandable, but maybe not the best timing...
JenLarkin
says
16 years ago
but basically the filed bug is "it's bad UI to not throw a JS alert when the user clicks this because...
JenLarkin
says
16 years ago
"they have to go through this big long process to get their stuff back online"
JenLarkin
says
16 years ago
when the entirety of the because is false
JenLarkin
says
16 years ago
and he keeps being told that it's false. He's filed three bugs so far that it doesn't work that way and it's supposed to
JenLarkin
says
16 years ago
and we keep rejecting the bug as invalid because that's not the correct business rule
JenLarkin
says
16 years ago
ow he's filing bugs that are due to the business rule that he thinks is correct that isn't
sociallydistressed
16 years ago
understands completely. I've dealt with people with a similar lack of ability to understand much of anything.
back to top
delete
reply
edit
cancel
cancel