Login
Sign Up For Free
English
中文 (繁體)
中文 (香港)
中文 (简体)
日本語
Filipino
Bahasa Indonesia
Bahasa Melayu
Pусский
Português (Brasil)
Magyar
Français
Español
Deutsch
Čeština
العربية
Català
Dansk
Ελληνικά
فارسی
Suomi
Gaeilge
Hindi
עברית
Hrvatski
Italiano
Norsk bokmål
Nederlands
한국어
Polski
Română
Slovenský
Svenska
Türkçe
українська
беларуская
ไทย
Standard view
bloggersblog
thinks
17 years ago
his plurks are shorter than his tweets.
latest #24
bloggersblog
says
17 years ago
the verb choices also help to reduce length.
MikeonTV
feels
17 years ago
his plurks are to trigger conversation rather than just give updates
Morton Fox
thinks
17 years ago
Plurk is more informal than Twitter
立即下載
margalit
says
17 years ago
I agree with Morton, Plurk is a lot less formal. The threads help make the conversation more relaxed and natural.
daysies
says
17 years ago
i think it's okay to have shorter plurks here than on Twitter as you're "spamming" a conversation rather than someone's timeline
daysies
says
17 years ago
not to say spamming is bad, unless it's a true spammer
daysies
says
17 years ago
one more thing, i think on plurk, lots of chatter is good, but on twitter, it's considered spamming.
bloggersblog
17 years ago
agrees with
daysies
- you would quickly fill up the stream with
replies
on Twitter
Venus
says
17 years ago
I know mine are
bonolisbari
says
17 years ago
i agree with Morton Fox
vickya
says
17 years ago
I agree plurking is way better and a lot more fun
cbelier
says
17 years ago
after observing everyone's pluks, I would agree.
Venus
says
17 years ago
so would a 140 plurk be a ploosh?
bloggersblog
says
17 years ago
yes it would be a ploosh
back to top
delete
reply
edit
cancel
cancel