Login
Sign Up For Free
English
中文 (繁體)
中文 (香港)
中文 (简体)
日本語
Filipino
Bahasa Indonesia
Bahasa Melayu
Pусский
Português (Brasil)
Magyar
Français
Español
Deutsch
Čeština
العربية
Català
Dansk
Ελληνικά
فارسی
Suomi
Gaeilge
Hindi
עברית
Hrvatski
Italiano
Norsk bokmål
Nederlands
한국어
Polski
Română
Slovenský
Svenska
Türkçe
українська
беларуская
ไทย
Standard view
stealthypoo
wonders
16 years ago
if i should start removing photos off fb..
latest #30
neilathotep
16 years ago
you can take them down, but they still have their "license" on them!
low
wonders
16 years ago
the odds of FB profitting from your photos. I tend not to put most of my photos there; that's what flickr is for.
stealthypoo
16 years ago
yeah flickr is the bulk of it..
立即下載
milktoast
thinks
16 years ago
the language of the license is pretty standard stuff. You also give 52 Clix a non-exclusive license to use your photos....
milktoast
16 years ago
You need a non-exclusive license in order to use the photos on the site
*at all*
.
milktoast
16 years ago
That said, it's not not above FB's moral standard to use your photos in an advertisement on their site, I would bet. They already use your
milktoast
16 years ago
image. I get "[Friend Name] likes Target! Shop at
Target.com
now!"
meloncollie
says
16 years ago
"Trust us"
says Mark Zuckerberg
milktoast
16 years ago
If you become a fan of a brand, they can use your picture and name to pimp their warez.
Quinn
16 years ago
oh great, now I need to start pulling my photos off 52clix too!
milktoast
16 years ago
52 Clix allows you to delete all of the photos permanently and terminate the license whenever you wish.
Keane
16 years ago
fears for people profitting off of my pics of
milktoast
!
neilathotep
16 years ago
yeah the perpetuance of the facebook clause is the really scary part. That you cannot revoke it by terminating you account ANYMORE
meloncollie
says
16 years ago
"The language is just too formal!" - Mark Zuckerberg
cjkaminski
16 years ago
did you see their explanation?
geofflee
says
16 years ago
Wow, they've reverted their Terms of Use.
stealthypoo
16 years ago
yup !! saw that.
*woot*
Keane
16 years ago
Poot!
milktoast
16 years ago
deleted my non-friend photos taken with my non-cell phone camera from the site anyway. Who knows what they'll decide in the future.
Quinn
16 years ago
isn't worried about Facebook using my photos. I think everyone is freaking out over nothing. I've seen all your facebook photos
milktoast
thinks
16 years ago
everyone is too. But deleted nonetheless because FB has proven themselves to be kind of shady.
Quinn
16 years ago
why not just slap a watermark over all your photos so FB wouldn't want to use them?
milktoast
16 years ago
Watermarks make photos look ugly and it's extra work.
Quinn
16 years ago
they would but at least you could share them with friends to enjoy the memories and not fear that the FB demons will steal your photos
milktoast
16 years ago
you mean you don't visit
snapshotist.com
every day?! Where's my "offended" emoticon?
Quinn
16 years ago
um... I meant other than that. I'm sure I check it as often as you read
blog.nermo.com
Quinn
16 years ago
hey look, they change it back.
www.nytimes.com/2009/02/...
stealthypoo
16 years ago
yup
stealthypoo
16 years ago
all fixed..
stealthypoo
16 years ago
like last night ish
back to top
delete
reply
edit
cancel
cancel