Pickleman says
13 years ago
curious of you think this counts as "off camera" flash. http://www.flickr.com/photos/kimncris/7663693042/lightbox/ strobist said NO
latest #16
rach
13 years ago
Does, but my viewpoint is wider. I could imagine not counting it since you are not controlling the flash, I am.
Pickleman says
13 years ago
yet I photographed it.
Pickleman says
13 years ago
the reason they rejected it was "no on camera flash" "see rule number 1"
立即下載
fuzzirella
13 years ago
I don't think it's a "strobist lighting technique" but i would call it off camera lighting
Pickleman says
13 years ago
"lame" I say...
fuzzirella
13 years ago
unless they think it is a photo taken in the mirror or something
Pickleman says
13 years ago
they are the killers of fun!
rach
13 years ago
Agrees with you! :-P
rach
13 years ago
Your response should be "but it's not MY on camera flash"
Pickleman says
13 years ago
I did say that. the guy just said -no on camera flash period-
TeeMcD
13 years ago
LOL- it's on A camera, so no, not "off camera" flash
josheee asks
13 years ago
Is the light coming from your flash or hers?
Pickleman says
13 years ago
hers
Pickleman says
13 years ago
it was a semi accident although i WAS attempting to catch it.
Pickleman says
13 years ago
I thought it might look neat
Pickleman says
13 years ago
but really I don't think it was all that great other than a nice shot of Rach in action
back to top