CaribouKen
11 years ago
Streak: A useful/scary Google Chrome extension that let's you see when someone has read the email you sent them... without them even knowing. (unsure) Creepy New G-mail Extension Allows Email Activity Tracking…...
latest #41
CaribouKen
11 years ago
I guess the next thing to figure out is how to block this thing. HuffPost Live
Magda K
11 years ago
(thinking)
Nikki
11 years ago
How is that different from the return receipt function that was in most local based email programs of yore?
立即下載
Ceejay Writer
11 years ago
you could usually opt out of sending return receipts, at least.
CaribouKen
11 years ago
nickolamartynov: As I recall, back then you had to agree to allow a return receipt. Streak bypasses confirmation by embedding an invisible element into the email that can be monitored remotely.
dkronfeld
11 years ago
Don't read email in a browser?
CaribouKen
11 years ago
This discussion offers some insight and a couple of suggestions. Adblock Plus • View topic - How to block Streak, stealth Chr...
dkronfeld
11 years ago
My email client won't load images unless I tell it to. I'm willing to bet this works with images.
dkronfeld
11 years ago
Or just read your email as plaintext, the way email was meant to be :-)
Nikki
11 years ago
The agreement thing came later, and then they disappeared all together. And now it's back.
CaribouKen
11 years ago
dkronfeld: Streak uses an "invisible div element" so I'm not sure if that would be blocked or not.
Nikki
11 years ago
I always read my Eudora email in preview mode and it never sent a read notice to the sender
dkronfeld
11 years ago
Yeah, I have to check to see if that's an issue for me if reading it as HTML
CaribouKen
11 years ago
Okay, yeah, that's an image element. Which Gmail now displays by default. You could avoid that if you could turn off image display in Gmail.
CaribouKen
11 years ago
Blocking the monitoring host would be trickier across multiple devices.
DirkM
11 years ago
Probably using a "hidden pixel" type of thing. I tend not to use web based gmail and use a client instead. From there, I can control if it downloads pictures.
dkronfeld
11 years ago
Dschink: Send me all of your usernames and passwords for all the services you use.
Ken_Aberdeen says
11 years ago
Thanks
dkronfeld
11 years ago
Yeah, some things are public (IP addresses (yes, I know that many are NATed, IPv6 will likely put an end to that)). This is creepy because it reports on your behaviour covertly.
dkronfeld
11 years ago
It's as if someone devised a way for your answering machine to report back when you've listened to a message.
DirkM
11 years ago
You can't NAT with IPv6? (unsure)
dkronfeld
11 years ago
You can, but why would you??
CaribouKen
11 years ago
Dschink: I guess the main things that bother me about Streak are that anyone can use it (no hacking skills required) and that it's available from the Google Chrome extensions page (quasi-sanctioned).
CaribouKen
11 years ago
The simplest way to avoid this issue might be to just go into Gmail Settings and change the Images option back to "Ask before displaying external images", which was the default until recently.
CaribouKen
11 years ago
Gmail - Choose Whether To Show Images Choose whether to show images - Gmail Help
DirkM
11 years ago
dkronfeld: why would you not? There may be something I don't understand about why you wouldn't still want your systems behind a firewall with masked addresses.
dkronfeld
11 years ago
DirkMcKeenan: NAT is a hack to get around the small IPv4 address space problem. It has the side effect of obscuring endpoint IP addresses, but that's a bad thing rather than a good thing.
dkronfeld
11 years ago
We do horrid things in order to get around the fact that NAT breaks end to end connectivity.
dkronfeld
11 years ago
This link actually explains it nicely: I Hate NAT! Or Do I...?
dkronfeld
11 years ago
There's nothing about NAT as a "security" mechanism that cannot be accomplished via a firewall that simply blocks unwanted traffic.
DirkM
11 years ago
ok, so it is just a security by obscurity method, not real security... right?
DirkM
11 years ago
One thing I'll not take his word on is the idea that we won't run out of IP addresses soon (depending on your definition of "soon")
DirkM
11 years ago
I can imagine the development of microbots if not nanobots which connect to each other via wireless networking. Most likely, they will use the prevailing method: IPv6 (unless it is replaced soon with IPv8-)
DirkM
11 years ago
erf. IPv8
DirkM
11 years ago
We already have arduinos shields with ethernet included on the main board.
DirkM
11 years ago
(drop "shields" from that last sentence. It's on the actual processor board)
DirkM
11 years ago
Once we get to the nanobot stage, and I still hold onto the expectation that we'll have nanobot networks in our bodies as a chosen augmentation in our lifetimes...
dkronfeld
11 years ago
I think that IPv6 gives us enough address space to assign an address to every atom in the observable universe.
back to top