Necro
10 years ago
[rp] So, quick question about definitions
latest #17
Necro
10 years ago
Let's assume that a character is not given a lot of story
Necro
10 years ago
just bits and pieces
Necro
10 years ago
so therefore, I made up a story that attempts to tie up the little hints of the stories of the character, including storylines of other characters that interacts with the aforementioned character
立即下載
Necro
10 years ago
so, in this case, would this be defined as an OC or an AU
Cherry
10 years ago
Neither, it's extensive headcanon.
Necro
10 years ago
keep in mind I'm keeping the appearance and powers as presented in the small stories
Necro
10 years ago
hmm, you would still define it as a canon character?
Cherry
10 years ago
If the character appeared in the canon then yes, I would. I wouldn't say that necessarily makes him more appable, but I don't think OC covers it if it's not your creation.
sandal phone
10 years ago
close to a 'canon oc' definition, imho
Necro
10 years ago
welp, time for iidx beatmania apps
♥︎ It's you?
10 years ago
yeah, if its a loooot of headcanon based on speculation its most like a canon oc
Necro
10 years ago
I was so happy when they had stories for their songs and then I realised it was just a silly thing they wrote about how the composers came up with the song
Necro
10 years ago
sandal phone
10 years ago
You're thinking of Vocaloid, or something similar to that?
Necro
10 years ago
something similiar, yes
Necro
10 years ago
EPIC PROG, I meant, whoops
back to top