原文報導有好幾篇的話可信度高了一點,原本只有查到一則英文報導,也不確定中文新聞的來源是什麼
黃道十二宮不曉得有沒有機會破案,今年已經50年了,如果之後dna發現是屬於某人,對方可能已經不在人世,不像華城殺人犯這個案子驗出dna屬於誰,還能去找嫌犯確認
dna驗出來也不代表對方一定是兇手,應該要看被採集的dna是哪種情形;黃道十二宮案的案發現場沒採集到可信的dna, 前陣子在Cheri Jo Bates褲子上採集到dna,結果驗出來是女性(再加上 Cheri Jo Bates的案子始終沒辦法確認是不是黃道十二宮做的);目前確定的是兇手有封信件的郵票背面採集到dna,有人在猜兇手舔郵票背面來貼
不過也有人指出,Allen曾騷擾Cheney的女兒(未告知對方家長就把她帶上船出遊,並且有騷擾的舉動)這可能是Cheney指控Allen的其中一項原因
具有可信度的點是,Allen曾在1968年因為騷擾學童而丟了小學教師工作
"Mulanax contacted Allen's former employer, the owner of a service station in Vallejo. The owner described Allen as an honest, efficient worker who had a habit of showing too much interest in small children, including one of the man's three daughters. "
Mulanax learned that Allen had recently taken the man's young daughter on his boat without the man's knowledge or permission. Mulanax wrote, "While on boat, Allen is alleged to have made improper advances towards the girl."
The man did not report Allen's behavior to police and had not seen him since the incident, which occurred approximately six weeks earlier
另一篇的說法是,騷擾事件發生時,Allen是隨著Cheney一家出遊
Don remembered the incident. His story is that he, his wife and daughter were camping with Leigh. The daughter was two or three-years old, and said something like "Uncle Leigh touched my bottom."
The daughter wasn't hurt or upset, and Cheney had no reason to be suspicious of Leigh's intentions, if in fact he had touched her. To be safe, Don never had his daughter around Leigh after that.
這篇的說法是This incident happened in 1965 or so, and obviously didn't hurt their friendship.
不過每個POI都有一堆瑣碎的經歷或可疑行徑,就算哪天終於看完這些資料,要考證也得花上好幾倍的時間
有些人為了出書,說他在他們發現了真正的兇手而帶出一堆資料,等同有固定比例的假資訊或無謂的資訊在他們出書受訪獲利的同時被一批批灑出來
記錯了,裸體在電話亭被逮捕的是Ross Sullivan