Login
Sign Up For Free
English
中文 (繁體)
中文 (香港)
中文 (简体)
日本語
Filipino
Bahasa Indonesia
Bahasa Melayu
Pусский
Português (Brasil)
Magyar
Français
Español
Deutsch
Čeština
العربية
Català
Dansk
Ελληνικά
فارسی
Suomi
Gaeilge
Hindi
עברית
Hrvatski
Italiano
Norsk bokmål
Nederlands
한국어
Polski
Română
Slovenský
Svenska
Türkçe
українська
беларуская
ไทย
Standard view
reese
has
16 years ago
to write a paper on my least favorite Constitutional right. This is gonna be fuuuuuuun!
latest #27
isle
says
16 years ago
you have the right not to be forced to write papers?
kaiskeebeat
16 years ago
right to bear arms?
reese
says
16 years ago
I love the right to bear arms! And that's covered by the Bill of Rights, not the Constitution.
立即下載
Surreal
16 years ago
the right to arm bears
kaiskeebeat
16 years ago
reese
thats very Texan of you
Charlemagne
shares
16 years ago
membres.lycos.fr/fredric...
reese
says
16 years ago
I <3 the right to bear arms. How could I not?
reese
says
16 years ago
CharlemagneAllen
, that's just genius!
Tara Millgrove
says
16 years ago
the right to arm bears?
Charlemagne
16 years ago
bALANcing
says
16 years ago
To petition a legislator and get consideration thereof, subject to resources available thereto.
bALANcing
says
16 years ago
just cause it sounds like bullshit
classicalgeek
says
16 years ago
oooooh you just gave me a great idea!
classicalgeek
thinks
16 years ago
she knows how to weaken the influence of the lobbyists . . . instead of paying legislators to listen to them, the legislators ought to have
classicalgeek
thinks
16 years ago
to pay to listen to causes.
classicalgeek
thinks
16 years ago
that 99% of legislators will stop listening to any but the causes they believe most in.
Tara Millgrove
says
16 years ago
of course, it's those same legislators who would have to put that idea into law, so I suspect it won't happen...
Glyphrunner
16 years ago
aherrick
: That's in there for a reason, though. It addressed the idea of no representation. In our current system, it gets abused, but
Glyphrunner
16 years ago
it is still important, otherwise minority and small group interests may never get heard.
Surreal
says
16 years ago
or... you'll only have independently wealthy legislators - think how well that worked for Rome .. or ones who vote for their personal
Surreal
16 years ago
good
LChamp
says
16 years ago
yeah, now our legislators get "independently" wealthy after they are elected and bought by lobbyists.
bALANcing
says
16 years ago
glyphrunner
I realize its in there for a reason and why but she has to choose something and that is almost the easiest one
bALANcing
says
16 years ago
to say you like the least -
bALANcing
says
16 years ago
unless you just go with the stance that its all ridiculous and needs to be rewritten to accomodate the change in times
reese
says
16 years ago
I thought about that as part of me actually feels that we need an overhaul.
back to top
delete
reply
edit
cancel
cancel