me, five minutes later: "Why did I google this?"
I thought because Pol Pot was anti-Soviet, anti-Vietnamese and highly suspicious of China that maybe the Marxist-Leninist-Maoists of the English-speaking internet would be like "ah, here's a murderous dictator we can condemn"
khmer rouge denialism is a new one on me
He studied in Paris, but instead of making money and a career, he returned home, and spent a few years dwelling with forest tribes to learn from the peasants.
that's a weird way to spell việt cộng
~the simple wisdom of the peasants~
the heavily-armed peasants
ah yes, forced relocation never leads to genocide
oh wait:
actually discussion question can you be a true leftist without reading Marx?
are we defining leftist as communist or just.... USA-centric hard left
well, that's the real question, isn't it
i'd say "yes" for leftist, no if you're gonna call yourself a communist
does that then mean revolution is only available for the educated?
also apparently the guy who wrote this counterpunch article is a raging anti-semite, so.
well, that's pretty counter-revolutionary, comrade
goes well with genocide denial though!
do we know how he feels vis-a-vis armenians
anyway really the root of my marx question is that I read kapital and that's several hours of my life I'm never getting back
this is one of those depressing but not necessarily unsurprising questions
yeah, I shouldn't have actually looked, the answer was obvious
I am so sorry for your time loss
I mean I did at least get college credit
"a monkish man of simple needs"
honestly that line sounds like a bad build-up in an erotic fanfiction