宇宙微調論證（fine-tuning argument）

What is the anthropic principle? | HowStuffWorks

目前閱讀的想法：
微調宇宙將機率碰撞的結果視為神蹟，人擇原理進一步解釋微調宇宙中為何有生物存在

宇宙與哲學的邊界在我心中越來越模糊了

"For instance, when you compare the electromagnetic force to gravity, we find that electromagnetism is 39 times stronger, according to physicist and author Victor J. Stenger. And that's handy because if the two powers were more evenly matched, stars wouldn't burn long enough for life to develop on an orbiting planet. "
電磁力、重力與恆星，沒思考過的部分

Weak anthropic principle: This response to anthropic coincidence may sound like a slice of common sense. Simply put, Carter pointed out that if our universe weren't hospitable to life, then we wouldn't be here to wonder about it. As such, there's no sense in asking why.

Strong anthropic principle: In this version, Carter draws on the notion of the Copernican Principle, which states that there's nothing special or privileged about Earth or humanity. He states that since we live in a universe capable of supporting life, then only life-supporting universes are possible.

Participatory anthropic principle, which states that no universe can be real until it is observed, and the final anthropic principle, which holds that intelligence is a necessary property of the universe; once created it can never be destroyed.

可以理解為什麼這個論證爭議很多了

有點鐵鎚人傾向？